Skip to main content

Closed card sort

A closed card sort is a usability method used to validate existing information structures. Participants categorize predefined items into specified groups, helping to confirm or refine the organization of content within a product or system.
Also known as:closed sorting, predefined card sorting, structured card sort

Definition

Closed card sorting is a user research method used to evaluate and confirm existing information structures. Participants organize predefined items into specified categories. This approach helps validate how users perceive and group content, ensuring that the information architecture aligns with user expectations.

This method is important because it can identify gaps or misalignments in the current structure. By confirming that users understand and relate to the categorization of information, designers can improve navigation and overall user experience. A well-structured information architecture enhances findability, reduces user frustration, and can lead to higher engagement and satisfaction.

Closed card sorts are typically applied during the design or redesign phases of a product. They are commonly used in website and application development when an existing structure needs validation. This method can be conducted in-person or remotely, making it adaptable to various research contexts.

Key Characteristics:

Participants use predefined categories.

Focuses on validating existing structures.

Helps ensure alignment with user mental models.

Can reveal areas for improvement in information architecture.

Expanded Definition

# Closed Card Sort

A closed card sort is a method used to validate existing information structures by providing participants with predefined categories.

Common Variations

In a closed card sort, participants are given a set of cards that represent content items, along with a fixed set of categories into which they must sort these items. This approach allows teams to assess how well the existing categories align with users' understanding and expectations. Variations can include different numbers of categories or the inclusion of subcategories to further refine the sorting process. Some teams may also adapt the method by allowing participants to suggest additional categories, although this leans more towards an open card sort.

Connection to Related Methods

Closed card sorts are closely related to open card sorts, where participants create their own categories. Both methods aim to improve information architecture, but they serve different purposes. While closed card sorts focus on validating predefined structures, open card sorts are useful for generating new ideas and insights. These methods can be complemented by usability testing, which helps evaluate how effective the final structure is in practice.

Practical Insights

Clearly define the categories before conducting a closed card sort to ensure consistency.

Consider the target audience's familiarity with the content when selecting categories.

Analyze sorting results to identify patterns and areas for improvement in the information structure.

Document participant feedback to understand the reasoning behind their sorting choices.

Key Activities

Closed card sorts help validate existing information structures through participant feedback.

Define the goals for the card sort to ensure alignment with project objectives.

Prepare a set of predefined categories for participants to sort cards into.

Recruit participants that represent the target audience for accurate insights.

Conduct the closed card sort session, guiding participants as needed.

Analyze the results to identify patterns and validate the existing structure.

Document findings and recommendations for potential adjustments to the information architecture.

Benefits

A closed card sort helps teams validate existing information structures, leading to improved user experiences and more efficient workflows. By applying this method correctly, organizations can ensure that content is organized in a way that meets user expectations and business goals.

Enhances alignment between user needs and information architecture.

Reduces the risk of usability issues by confirming logical content groupings.

Facilitates clearer decision-making about content organization.

Saves time in the design process by quickly identifying effective structures.

Improves user satisfaction by ensuring intuitive navigation and access to information.

Example

A product team is developing a new e-commerce website. The designer has created a preliminary information architecture based on user research and competitor analysis. To validate this structure, the product manager decides to conduct a closed card sort with potential users. The goal is to confirm that the proposed categories align with users' expectations and mental models.

The researcher prepares a set of cards, each labeled with a specific product category, such as "Shoes," "Clothing," and "Accessories." During the testing session, participants are instructed to sort these cards into predefined groups that reflect how they would expect to navigate the site. The researcher observes the participants as they work, noting any confusion or inconsistencies in their sorting choices. This feedback is crucial for identifying areas where the proposed structure may not meet user needs.

After the card sorting sessions, the team reviews the findings. The designer and product manager analyze the results, considering which categories were frequently misclassified or combined. They use this data to refine the information architecture, ensuring it better reflects user expectations. By employing a closed card sort, the team successfully validates and enhances the website’s structure, leading to a more intuitive user experience.

Use Cases

Closed card sorts are particularly useful during the design phase to validate and refine existing information structures. They help ensure that content is organized in a way that aligns with user expectations.

Design: Evaluate the organization of a website's navigation menu to confirm it meets user needs before implementation.

Design: Test the categorization of product features in an app to ensure users can easily find what they need.

Optimisation: Assess the structure of an online help center to improve user access to support articles.

Discovery: Gather feedback on the arrangement of content for a new feature, ensuring it aligns with user mental models.

Delivery: Validate the organization of a new e-commerce site’s product categories before launching.

Optimisation: Review the existing taxonomy of a digital library to enhance user search experience.

Design: Confirm the grouping of services in a mobile app to streamline user navigation.

Challenges & Limitations

Teams can struggle with closed card sorts due to misconceptions about their purpose and the limitations of the method itself. Often, participants may not fully understand the categories or may feel constrained by the predefined options, leading to results that do not accurately reflect user mental models.

Limited participant insight: Participants may not express their true thoughts if the categories do not resonate with them.

Hint: Ensure categories are relevant and intuitive by conducting pre-sort interviews or surveys.

Bias in category selection: The predefined categories may reflect the team's perspective rather than the user's needs.

Hint: Involve diverse stakeholders in category creation to capture a broader range of insights.

Inflexibility in data interpretation: Results can be misinterpreted if teams do not consider the context of the sorting task.

Hint: Analyze results alongside qualitative feedback to gain deeper understanding.

Overemphasis on consensus: Focusing too much on achieving agreement among participants can overlook individual differences.

Hint: Highlight variances in sorting patterns to identify unique user needs.

Sample size limitations: A small number of participants may not provide a representative view of the user base.

Hint: Aim for a larger and more diverse participant pool to enhance reliability of findings.

Time constraints: Closed card sorts can be rushed, leading to superficial results.

Hint: Allocate sufficient time for participants to think through their choices and provide rationale.

Tools & Methods

Closed card sorts help validate and refine existing information structures by organizing content into predefined categories.

Methods

User testing to gather feedback on how participants categorize information.

Analysis of sorting results to identify patterns and preferences in user organization.

Iterative sorting sessions to refine categories based on user input.

Tools

Remote testing platforms for conducting closed card sorts with participants from various locations.

Survey tools for collecting responses and sorting preferences from users.

Data analysis software to interpret sorting results and visualize category relationships.

How to Cite "Closed card sort" - APA, MLA, and Chicago Citation Formats

UX Glossary. (2023, February 11, 2026). Closed card sort. UX Glossary. https://www.uxglossary.com/glossary/closed-card-sort

Note: Access date is automatically set to today. Update if needed when using the citation.